Use case

Proof of trademark use

A registered but unused trademark can be revoked. Documenting actual use, over time, is the best defense.

The situation

One scenario, two outcomes

The same moment, depending on whether the work was timestamped or not.

The trigger

Your trademark, registered nine years ago, has been in continuous use on a secondary product line.

Without proof

A third party files a revocation action for non-use. The burden of proof falls on you, over a five-year period: paper catalogs long gone, the website redesigned twice, invoices scattered across three systems.

With a certificate

Every quarter, website captures, campaigns and packaging were certified. The timeline of use exports as a single, continuous, dated file. The action is dismissed on the evidence, with no need to reconstruct anything.

Votre situation est différente ?

The need

Revocation, reference period, scattered evidence.

Use is proven, year by year

After five years without genuine use, a trademark can become subject to a revocation action. The burden of proof falls on the owner, over a period that's often distant — once the records have disappeared.

Build the file as you go

Catalogs, campaigns, invoices, website captures, packaging: certified regularly, these elements form a continuous, dated timeline — far more solid than a file reconstructed under pressure.

Useful on the offense too

The same documentation serves to demonstrate acquired reputation, to assert your trademark against a later filing, or to establish prior unregistered use.

Website captures, campaigns, packaging, catalogs
Periodic deposits automatable via API
Timeline of use exportable as a single file
Free-form evidence in civil matters — French Civil Code, Article 1358

For an answer tailored to your case, talk to an expert: this page describes a typical situation, yours has its own specifics.

Contact us

See also

Two related pages to explore next.

For businesses

Open →

Defensive publication

Open →